just now

Liquidity Finder Ltd is incorporated in England and Wales, company number 10610740, registered address 167-169 Great Portland Street, Fifth Floor, London W1W 5PF, United Kingdom.
Published: just now


1. Rethinking 2016 as a Model for 2024
Leveraging the 2016 U.S. election as a template for forecasting 2024's potential outcomes might seem logical on the surface but could ultimately lead to flawed assumptions due to stark contrasts in context, voter sentiment, and candidate positioning. In 2016, Trump’s victory blindsided analysts and markets alike, with most major forecasting models, like FiveThirtyEight, assigning him around a 28% chance of winning. This unexpected outcome spurred rapid market recalibrations, as investors scrambled to interpret the incoming administration’s policies. By contrast, Trump’s 2024 candidacy is perceived as significantly more competitive, with current odds placing him above 50% in some prediction models, depending on the polling source. This shift in expectation indicates that a Trump win would likely not provoke the same degree of market shock as it did in 2016. While any unexpected result could still generate volatility, investors are arguably better prepared for a Trump win, dampening the probability of a drastic market shift on par with 2016. As such, market players might need to focus more on policy implications rather than bracing for surprises in outcome.
2. Prolonged Election Uncertainty and Its Impact on Markets
The U.S. equity market has historically struggled with prolonged election uncertainties, with significant examples from both the 2000 and 1876 elections underscoring how unresolved electoral disputes can instigate prolonged volatility. In 2000, a contentious recount process in Florida delayed the official declaration of a winner by over a month. This uncertainty induced a notable drop in the S&P 500, as apprehensive investors sought stability amidst the prolonged suspense. Similarly, the 1876 election experienced months of unresolved tension, exacerbated by the “Long Depression,” further compounding investor concerns and economic downturns. As we approach 2024, where tight races in battleground states are expected, there exists a considerable risk that recounts or legal disputes could delay a definitive result, mirroring the volatility seen in previous protracted elections. For markets, this would likely translate into hesitancy, with investors holding off on substantial commitments until a clear outcome emerges, increasing short-term volatility and risk aversion across equities.
3. Congress and Presidential Agenda: The Role of Unified and Divided Government
The power of a president to enact significant policy changes is intrinsically tied to the makeup of Congress. Recent presidencies have often commenced with unified government control, enabling swift advancement of the executive’s legislative agenda. A united Congress facilitates ambitious initiatives, such as fiscal stimulus, healthcare reform, or infrastructure investments, which have significant market implications. However, a divided Congress—where one party controls either the Senate or the House—often results in legislative gridlock, limiting the president’s ability to achieve significant policy wins and increasing the likelihood of fiscal debates and government shutdown risks. As 2024 nears, prediction models suggest a real possibility of a divided government, with neither party guaranteed sweeping control over both the presidency and Congress. Such an outcome could require substantial compromises on policies around fiscal stimulus, debt ceiling negotiations, and critical federal appointments, potentially resulting in market ambivalence or cautious optimism depending on the sectors most likely to be affected by this legislative impasse.
4. The Correlation of Polling Errors Across States and Elections
The historical correlation of polling errors across key states and election cycles has been a recurring theme, significantly impacting both the presidential race and congressional predictions. In 2016, polling data underestimated Republican support across several crucial swing states, ultimately tipping the scales in Trump’s favour. This pattern repeated in 2020, where many pre-election forecasts once again undervalued Republican turnout and performance. Such cross-state correlation suggests that polling errors tend to propagate across similar demographic or geographic regions, meaning a polling miss in one battleground state often mirrors inaccuracies in other key regions. For 2024, this raises caution for analysts relying on polling data to project outcomes in close races. Should polls once again underestimate Republican turnout or voter behaviour, such inaccuracies could ripple across predictions for both the presidency and congressional seats, underscoring the need for a critical examination of polling methodologies and the potential impact on market expectations, particularly in sectors sensitive to legislative shifts.
In preparing for the 2024 U.S. election, traders should incorporate lessons from past elections while accounting for present-day nuances. The evolving political landscape demands attention not only to candidate forecasts but also to the broader context of potential prolonged election disputes, the composition of Congress, and the ongoing correlation of polling errors. By recognizing these variables, traders can better anticipate areas of market sensitivity and prepare for potential volatility. In an election cycle where surprises are possible but not unprecedented, historical precedents combined with present-day insights will be key to navigating this complex terrain effectively.
This content may have been written by a third party. ACY makes no representation or warranty and assumes no liability as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided, nor any loss arising from any investment based on a recommendation, forecast or other information supplies by any third-party. This content is information only, and does not constitute financial, investment or other advice on which you can rely.
Why Is Forex Trading So Difficult?
How To Master MT4 & MT5 - Tips And Tricks For Traders
The Importance Of Fundamental Analysis In Forex Trading
Forex Leverage Explained: Mastering Forex Leverage In Trading & Controlling Margin
The Importance Of Liquidity In Forex: A Beginner's Guide
Close All Metatrader Script: Maximise Your Trading Efficiency And Reduce Stress
Best Currency Pairs To Trade In 2024
Forex Trading Hours: Finding The Best Times To Trade FX
MetaTrader Expert Advisor - The Benefits Of Algorithmic Trading And Forex EAs
ACY Securities is one of Australia's fastest growing multi-asset online trading providers, offering ultra-low-cost trading, rock-solid execution, technologically superior account management and premium market analysis.
Select the categories and companies you wish to follow directly to your person rss feed.
Create Custom RSS FeedSign up and join over 5,000 professional members who receive personalized news alerts, curated professional connections, and more for free!
Weekly industry updates and views from Integral, Sunday 01 November, 2026
Americans vote on November 3 for all 435 seats in the House of Representatives and a third of the Senate. The presidency is not on the ballot, which means any new Congress will still need the President's signature to turn bills into law. Markets care about the midterms less for the laws that follow and more for what changes in oversight, budgets and the regulatory mood of Washington.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission has said it is not currently convinced that prediction markets for retail clients are in the public interest. ASIC Chair Sarah Court said prediction market contracts have all the features of a bet, likening them to binary options, which are banned for retail clients.
Binance has confirmed a security incident with an estimated total impact of around $6.3 billion, linked by its initial investigation to a compromised DevOps engineer's laptop. Around $3 billion has been frozen on-chain, and the exchange says it will cover all losses from its SAFU fund and company funds.
US crypto exchange Coinbase has reported net income of $719 million for the third quarter of 2026, up 66% from $432.6 million a year earlier. Prediction markets passed $200 million in annualised revenue, and paid Coinbase One subscribers reached an all-time high.
Webull Securities Co., Ltd., the Japanese subsidiary of Webull Corporation, has started handling US Treasury bonds, giving customers access to about 20,000 bonds as of 30 October 2026. The service lets users trade market-traded bonds like stocks, with real-time prices and yields, from $100.
Intercontinental Exchange and Trade[XYZ] have agreed to bring Trade[XYZ]’s perpetual markets onshore in the US through a new regulated market and clearing structure for round-the-clock retail trading built on Hyperliquid, operated separately from ICE’s institutional futures franchise, subject to regulatory approvals.
The Utah Attorney General's Office has filed 14 criminal charges against KalshiEX, LLC, the operator of US prediction market Kalshi, in a case that names co-founders Tarek Mansour, Chief Executive Officer, and Luana Lopes Lara, Chief Operating Officer, as co-defendants.
US blockchain payments company Ripple and US crypto exchange Coinbase have partnered to make Ripple's US dollar stablecoin, Ripple USD (RLUSD), available across Coinbase's platforms
The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has secured High Court undertakings to ensure that global crypto exchange HTX, formerly known as Huobi, will not knowingly promote cryptoasset services unlawfully to UK consumers.